The Obama Administration has set a new record for the number of times it has failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests, the Associated Press reported Friday.

Obama-liar-in-chiefThe Obama Administration has set a new record for the number of times it has failed to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests, the Associated Press reported Friday.

“In more than one in six cases, or 129,825 times, government searchers said they came up empty-handed last year,” according to the AP.

People who submitted FOIA requests in 2015 received either censored material or none at all 77 percent of the time. That figure is up from 65 percent during President Obama’s first year in office. Even that year, the administration got off to poor start by using FOIA exemptions 466,402 times the National Press Club reported, which was a 50 percent increase over the last year George W. Bush was in office, reported.

Some exemptions include: Information classified to protect national security; documents related solely the internal practices of the agency; inter-agency and intra-agency memorandum, which would be privileged in civil litigation; and certain information that is compiled for law enforcement purposes.

Many in the media have been highly critical of the Obama’s administration’s unresponsiveness to FOIA requests, particularly after the president promised to be the most transparent executive branch in history. AP editor Ted Bridis tweeted on Friday:

Former CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last summer that “FOIA law was intended to facilitate the timely release of public information. Instead, federal officials have perverted it and use it to obfuscate, obstruct and delay,” she said. “The broken system is not by accident, it’s by design.”

Vice News reporter Jason Leopold testified that Obama administration officials are not doing what the law requires. “Often, information delayed is information denied,” he said. “I have submitted thousands of FOIA requests to dozens of different agencies, and in my experience, fewer than one percent of my requests have been decided within the timeframe required by FOIA.”

“It seems like they’re doing the minimal amount of work they need to do,” Leopold told the AP. “I just don’t believe them. I really question the integrity of their search.”

“The website Gawker took legal action against the State Department after the agency responded to a request in 2013 saying that it could not find any emails that ex-Hillary Clinton aide Philippe Reines sent to reporters. The agency later turned up 90,000 such messages,” the Washington Free Beaconreported.

As reported by Western Journalism, Judicial Watch took the Obama administration’s State Department to court over its failure to reply to its FOIA requests regarding Clinton and some of her aides at the agency. Federal District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, sided with the government watchdog group.

“There has been a constant drip, drip, drip of declarations [from the State Department]. When does it stop?” the judge said last month from the bench. “This case is about the public’s right to know.”

Sullivan also said the department’s handling of the email controversy has created at least a “reasonable suspicion” the public’s access to documents under FOIA has been undermined.

Why Threaten NKorea & China? Would Obama Start A War To Stay In Office?


Obama-Big-brotherBy Michael Synder
Is Barack Obama trying to start a war, and will that war be used as an excuse to stay in office once his term is over? Late in his second term, Obama is starting to become extremely aggressive with the rest of the world. He just angered China by sailing an aircraft carrier task force past disputed islands in the South China Sea, he is provoking North Korea by simulating an invasion of that nation during a military exercise that is going to involve more than 300,000 troops, and he is backing Saudi Arabia and Turkey as they make moves that could very well start World War III in the Middle East. If a war did begin, that could give Obama the excuse that he needs to exercise his emergency powers, and that could potentially include suspending the election that is scheduled for November.

I know that all of this sounds a little bizarre, but it would help to explain Obama’s extremely aggressive behavior lately.

For example, why is the U.S. military risking a major incident on the Korean peninsula?

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is about as paranoid as they come, and he is extremely alarmed by the massive military exercise that is about to begin in South Korea. More than 300,000 troops are gathering for what is being billed as the biggest military exercise in the history of that nation.

Reportedly, U.S. and South Korean forces plan to simulate an invasion of North Korea and practice the elimination of North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction.

In response to these “exercises”, Kim Jong Un has placed his nuclear weapons on standby for “use at any moment”, and he is warning that North Korea may launch a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike”…

North Korea warned it would make a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike” in response to joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises that began Monday.

The news was announced in a statement by the National Defense Commission of North Korea and published in the state-run Korean Central News Agency.

“As the joint military exercises to be staged by the enemies are regarded as the most undisguised nuclear war drills aimed to infringe upon the sovereignty of the DPRK, its military counteraction will be more preemptive and offensive nuclear strike to cope with them,” the statement read.

I don’t care how crazy someone is – if they have nuclear weapons and they threaten to hit the United States with a preemptive nuclear strike, I am going to get alarmed.

Remember, North Korea did claim to successfully test a hydrogen bomb in January, and the North Koreans did successfully launch a satellite into orbit in February.

The North Koreans absolutely hate us. In fact, hatred for the United States is one of the pillars of their society. I know that may sound strange to many Americans, but it is true. If you can believe it, each year they actually have an entire month during which hatred for America is celebrated.

Tensions on the Korean peninsula are running extremely high, and a single hydrogen bomb could potentially kill millions of people.

So why risk an incident?

Why provoke North Korea more than necessary?

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has been provoking China in the South China Sea.

Yes, it is a problem that China has seized control of several important islands in the Spratly and Paracel island chains. But there are other ways to handle this crisis rather than trying to show how tough you are.

Last month, China deployed surface-to-air missile systems on the disputed islands. Obama’s response was to sail an aircraft carrier task force past the islands to see if China would start shooting at it. The following comes from an article about this incident that was posted by the Navy Times…

The U.S. Navy has dispatched a small armada to the South China Sea.

The carrier John C. Stennis, two destroyers, two cruisers and the 7th Fleet flagship have sailed into the disputed waters in recent days, according to military officials. The carrier strike group is the latest show of force in the tense region, with the U.S. asserting that China is militarizing the region to guard its excessive territorial claims.

Stennis is joined in the region by the cruisers Antietam and Mobile Bay, and the destroyers Chung-Hoon and Stockdale. The command ship Blue Ridge, the floating headquarters of the Japan-based 7th Fleet, is also in the area, en route to a port visit in the Philippines. Stennis deployed from Washington state on Jan. 15.

Do we really want to go to war with China over these islands?

The first time we sailed a military vessel through those waters after China had claimed those islands, a Chinese state-run newspaper boldly declared that China “is not frightened to fight a war with the U.S. in the region“.

Most Americans don’t realize this, but our relationship with China is rapidly going downhill. There is more to this than just the South China Sea, but without a doubt this is a major point of contention as far as the Chinese government is concerned.

At the same time, we keep getting closer to World War III erupting in the Middle East. Last month, defense ministers from 49 different nations met in Brussels to discuss a ground invasion of Syria, and since that time forces have been massing in northern Saudi Arabia and southern Turkey.

If a ground invasion of Syria does take place, the goal would be to go to Damascus and take down the Assad regime. That would put “coalition forces” in direct conflict with Iran, Hezbollah and most importantly the Russians. It could very easily be the spark that sets off World War III, but Saudi Arabia, Turkey and their allies will never go ahead without the direct approval of the Obama administration.

Barack Obama does not need all of these flashpoints to erupt in order to evoke his emergency powers.

He just needs one of them.

Throughout American history, presidents have always had emergency powers, but since 9/11 these powers have been greatly enhanced. Given the right circumstances, a U.S. president could now essentially declare himself (or herself) a dictator for the duration of the crisis.

Of course the word “dictator” would never actually be used, but that would be the reality of the situation.

And if we had a “national emergency” that was bad enough, Barack Obama would have the authority to postpone or suspend the upcoming election.

Let us hope and pray that does not happen, but the truth is that such a scenario could actually take place. Hopefully what we are witnessing around the globe right now are not attempts by Obama to artificially manufacture such a crisis. Let us hope and pray that when his time is up that Obama is ready to gracefully move into retirement.

Breaking: Obama’s College Records Are Finally Released – What They Say Could Get Him Impeached

Since Barack Obama first became president, he has been doing everything he can to ensure that his college records remained sealed. He was very successful in this endeavor: until now.

Recently, “Americans for Freedom of Information” released copies of Obama’s transcripts from Occidental College, and what they revealed could get him impeached. According to America’s Freedom Fighters, the documents reveal the future president received financial aid as a student from Indonesia under the name of Barry Soetoro.

The transcript shows that when Obama applied for financial aid, he was awarded with a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. In order to qualify for this scholarship, students must first claim foreign citizenship.

This could finally be the proof that birthers need to get Obama impeached. This coupled with the fact that Obama was born in Kenya and that there is no record of him ever applying for U.S. citizenship certainly does not help his case at all.

The White House is reportedly in panic mode at the moment as they work to find a way to spin this in their favor, but there’s only so much they can do. The reality is that our Constitution states that a president must be born INSIDE this country in order to lead it. Clearly, Obama was not born here, so it’s time for him to get OUT!

What do you think about this? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Obama: Working To Reform Our Criminal Justice Sysem

corporate_obama32President Obama was Monday’s KVML “Newsmaker of the Day”. Here are his words:

“Hi, everybody. Today, there are 2.2 million people behind bars in America and millions more on parole or probation. Every year, we spend $80 billion in taxpayer dollars to keep people incarcerated. Many are non-violent offenders serving unnecessarily long sentences.

I believe we can disrupt the pipeline from underfunded schools to overcrowded jails. I believe we can address the disparities in the application of criminal justice, from arrest rates to sentencing to incarceration. And I believe we can help those who have served their time and earned a second chance get the support they need to become productive members of society.

That’s why over the course of this year, I’ve been talking to folks around the country about reforming our criminal justice system to make it smarter, fairer, and more effective.

In February, I sat down in the Oval Office with police officers from around the country. In the spring, I met with police officers and young people in Camden, New Jersey, where they’re using community policing and data to drive down crime. Over the summer, I visited a prison in Oklahoma to talk with inmates and corrections officers about rehabilitating prisoners, and preventing more people from ending up there in the first place. Two weeks ago, I visited West Virginia to meet with families battling prescription drug and heroin abuse, as well as people who are working on new solutions for treatment and rehabilitation. Last week, I traveled to Chicago to thank police chiefs from across the country for all that their officers do to protect Americans, to make sure they’ve got the resources to get the job done, and to call for commonsense gun safety reforms that would make officers and their communities safer.

And we know that having millions of people in the criminal justice system, without any ability to find a job after release, is unsustainable. It’s bad for communities and it’s bad for our economy.

So on Monday, I’ll travel to Newark, New Jersey to highlight efforts to help Americans who’ve paid their debt to society reintegrate back into their communities. Everyone has a role to play, from businesses that are hiring ex-offenders to philanthropies that are supporting education and training programs. And I’ll keep working with people in both parties to get criminal justice reform bills to my desk, including a bipartisan bill that would reduce mandatory minimums for non-violent drug offenders and reward prisoners with shorter sentences if they complete programs that make them less likely to commit a repeat offense.

There’s a reason that good people across the country are coming together to reform our criminal justice system. Because it’s not about politics. It’s about whether we as a nation live up to our founding ideal of liberty and justice for all. And working together, we can make sure that we do.

Thanks, everybody.”

The “Newsmaker of the Day” is heard every weekday morning on AM 1450 KVML at 6:45, 7:45 and 8:45 AM.

Obama Talks Martial Law, Texas Takeover, and Conspiracy Theory

Something very wrong is in the air. Something very very wrong. First, listen to Obama as headdresses the topic of a martial law takeover: “The politics has to change. And the people who are troubled by this have to be as intense, and as organized, and as adamant about this issue as folks on the other side who are absolutists and think that any gun safety measures are somehow an assault on freedom or Communistic. Or a plot by me to take over and stay in power forever or something….”




What Obama just said there was a real mouthful. Pay very careful attention to the words he used. First of all, who is Obama referring to as if he is speaking about an “enemy” when he refers to “absolutists?” What exactly is an “absolutist,” and why are they bad? I’ve offered this information before, but time and time again it goes unnoticed. The following two posts will tell you definitively what side Barack Obama is on, and in doing so will spell out in bright neon who the “absolutists” are. 

How “Fundamentally Transforming” America Relates to the Communist Manifesto

Obama Ushers In Armageddon to America

What is an absolutist? To a devout Communist, which the above two links make VERY clear Obama is, “absolutists” are those of us who believe in the rule of law, our Constitution, and our civil rights absolutely. In the video below, you’ll learn that just four days after signing the N.D.A.A., President Obama explicitly referred to the Tea Party as “EXTREMISTS?” Accident? HARDLY!




The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Sections 1021 and 1022, authorizes the indefinite military detention, without charge or trial, of any person, including an American citizen, and applies the “Law of War,” to U.S. soil, making the United States legally a battlefield.

People Against the NDAA (PANDA) was founded by Dan Johnson in January 2012. Johnson is a remarkable young man – he’s only 20 years old, and is already a nationally known writer and speaker. PANDA is the largest organization of its kind in the world, and has worked on over 18 pieces of state and local anti-NDAA legislation. Johnson spoke at the Freedom Forum in Santa Cruz, CA on March 19, 2014, where he broke down the law and discussed its impacts on citizens:






Breitbart reported: 

On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.

This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.

For anyone who doesn’t know what that means, let me break it down for you. There is nothing theoretical about it, so save the tin foil hat jokes. That is reality, the worst kind imaginable, on a heavy dose of steroids. Why Steroids? Because every one of you out there saying the American troops would never fire on you may or may not be right. Guess what? Do you think foreign troops under the control of The Fuhrer Obama and his SS Officer Loretta Lynch will flinch?

Short of Divine Intervention, or some variable as yet unknown, Obama WILL declare martial law prior to the 2016 election. Former US presidential candidate Alan Keyes warned that Barack Obama has a ‘scheme’ to declare martial law in America, and remain in place for a 3rd term. Current Republican presidential candidate Benjamin Carson warned back in September 2014 that the 2016 election may never happen if civil unrest and anarchy breaks out in America.​ Remember this comment: 



Carson hasn’t been drinking the Kool-Aid, and since his comments, every single danger Dr. Carson spoke has gotten infinitely worse… particularly in Texas! But how do we KNOW Obama will declare Martial Law? You find any other explanation after hearing the following: 

1. If a Republican wins the White House, not just Obama’s 8 years, but his entire life’s work will be nullified almost instantly. Bills have already passed just waiting a Presidential signature for the repeal of Obamacare, the nullification of the Obama’s illegal Executive Orders, and just about everything else Obama “accomplished.” It’s safe to say then, that Obama NEEDS a Democrat to win. 

2. Who are his options? Until Valerie Jarrett, under the direction of Barack Obama leaked all the Clinton email server information, Hillary was a virtual shoe-in for the Presidency, much as it pains me to say it. Granted, the leaks were pre-Trump Mania, but I still think she would have won handedly. 


3. I’ve heard the argument that Obama would never be able to “control” Hillary. Duh. Of course not. They hate each other, BUT, do you think Obama would risk losing EVERYTHING, ALL OF IT, HIS LIFE’S WORK, by putting all his money on Joe Biden, who in all likelihood WILL probably get in the race, but has a slim chance to win at best? 


Because with Hillary out of the way, it will be MUCH easier for Obama to not only declare Martial Law, but do so without a Presidential candidate clamoring to get into office. and not only is Joe Biden on record saying he’d rather be Obama’s VP for a third term, but liberals would also support it. Until you give me a better reason for sinking Hillary’s campaign, THAT is your assurance Obama is not leaving.

Per Steve Quayle:

The captain asked him and several other younger marines if they were mentally prepared to start going door to door and confiscating weapons from civilians in Texas. This also means checkpoints on highways and other roads to catch people in their vehicles.



What is Obama’s beef with Texas anyway? Recall that back in May, Texas Governor Called Obama a Liar With Regard to Jade Helm, and Had Texas State Guard Monitoring The President’s “Exercises.”Shortly thereafter, DHS, FEMA Mobile Command Centers Were Spotted Parked at a Texas FedEx Terminal, as if they were expecting trouble in the near future. Then, in late June, the Texas Governor once again Mobilized the State Militia’s To Protect Against Obama’s Occupying Federal Troops.Finally, most recently, Military and U.S. Agents Were Reported to be Patrolling Texas Streets Asking Mysterious Questions to Resident. Why? Check out the following two videos. 



In the third and final video, ask yourself why the U.S. is loading up on nuclear gear? What are they preparing for, or what are they planning? The military doesn’t just bulk up on extra gear for fun. 





Most likely Obama will conduct some type of a “False Flag Attack” on the American People. Our country has a rich history of false flags, however Obama probably has as many false flag attempts as all the others combined.

Wikipedia defines False Flag as:

False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.

Our country has done things like this before. If you are not familiar with Operation Northwoods look into it.

Operation Northwoods was a series of false flag proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962, but were rejected by the Kennedy administration. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit perceived acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of Operation Northwoods was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”.

Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

That is the tip of the iceberg. Our country’s politicians have been more than willing throughout history to sacrifice innocent civilians to further a political gain for themselves personally. Some of the more well known False Flags just that I’ve covered under Obama include:

Adam Lanza: The Fictional Perpetrator of the Sandy Hook Hoax

The Sandy Hook Hoax: Convince a Skeptic

Ads Seeking Actors For “STAGED” Shooting Found Before Ft. Hood

ALERT: Craigslist Ad Asking for CRISIS ACTORS in Houston For JULY 4th 

Another False Flag? Atlanta Craigslist Solicits Crisis Actors For Mock Disaster

Was The Navy Yard Shooting Tied To Obama Being Tried For Treason?


Nuke 2

Government Slaves Reports:

(William Wallace)  Dr. Jim Garrow, the same one that reported the death of Andrew Breitbart  and Tom Clancy, came out as an ex CIA Agent recently. The same Jim Garrow that runs Pink Pagoda Girls that rescues young girls from death and abortion in China.

On November 19th, via social media, Jim revealed via social media the details of Obama’s biggest false flag to date, that thankfully went bust. Obama attemoted to detonate a nuclear weapon on U.S. soil. Ultimately it went off in the Atlantic. In his account Jim reported:

Three individuals have just saved 300 million lives in the past 2 weeks. They saved the 90% of the population that would be dead if Bathhouse Barry had not been stopped from using 3 nuclear devices against the American populace. 2 Army Generals and 1 Navy Admiral, whose duties included the safeguarding and oversight of the nuclear arsenal. Obama ordered that 3 nukes be transported in a major breach of protocol and safety regulations of long standing. He wanted it NOW, and these officers were made aware of what the intention was. The admiral had the one Navy nuke taken 200 miles off South Carolina and detonated deep in the ocean. The other 2 nukes disappeared thanks to the handiwork of the 2 Generals, the numbers 1 and 2 men in charge of the Army ordinance. These three men are heroes of the highest order. Look up the events of 2 Generals and 1 Admiral being dismissed in the past two weeks and you will find their names. They saved your lives and the lives of 300 million of your fellow citizens.

Mr. Obama’s intention was to set off the three nukes to devastate all computer related systems on the continent thus taking America back 200 years and guaranteeing a total breakdown in society and with in one year the death of 300 million Americans. To see how this would be possible read, “One Second After”. You can get it on Amazon.

Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day our exclusive high level military intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas airforce base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer.



Found in the CBS report entitled ‘Graham: Nukes In Hands Of Terrorists Could Result In Bomb Coming To Charleston Harbor’, the report details Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in Charleston, South Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer. The CBS report reads:

“He [Graham] says if there is no U.S. response [to Syria], Iran will not believe America’s resolve to block Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Graham also says those nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists could result in a bomb coming to Charleston Harbor.”

Graham is quite literally saying that if we do not launch a war with Syria, South Carolina may be nuked. And this ultimately reeks of yet another false flag being orchestrated by the United States government in order to send us into war, or at the very least a threat. Except this time, we’re talking about nuclear weapons. Amazingly, we were the first to get intel on this from our credible and extremely high level military source, who told us the following:

“Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.”

This was sent to us before the Graham report came out warning about the nuclear attack on South Carolina, and coincides exactly with what Graham is saying. I am deeply concerned by these findings, and ask everyone to spread the word on this information immediately. Whether or not Graham is receiving intel from higher ups and believes in a legitimate terror attack on the horizon is unknown, but the reality here is that we have intelligence that has linked the unsigned transfer of nuclear warheads to this exact location.

Here is the video report we did on Tuesday regarding the missing nuclear warheads:



Following the report, rumors crediting Kremlin intelligence sources were circulated online in October, 2013, about a botched “false flag” attack involving a nuclear weapon detonated off the coast of Charleston. Conspiracy theorists alleged that an earthquake that occurred off the coast of Charleston on October 8, 2013, was caused by a nuclear blast.





Big Nuke











Martiall Law 5


Political Dissidents Homes Being Marked By FEMA Prior to Martial Law?

WalMarts Converted to Prisons are Done, Elites Prepare Underground Bunkers

Emperor Obama is Rehearsing Martial Law – Major Update as of 2pm

Obama Signs Executive Order Permanently Implementing Martial Law

Military and U.S. Agents Patrolling Texas Streets Asking Mysterious Questions

DHS is Filming Your Cars Every Movement With Unconstitutional RFID Chips

FEMA Concentration Camps Disguised As Malls Being Built Everywhere

Veterans: Obama is Coming For Your Guns, and he Will Get Them! 

Abbott Calls Obama a Liar  & Has National Guard Monitoring Jade Helm


Government “Threat List:” 8 Million People To Be Detained Immediately

More Revealed About Secret Underground Tunnels, Walmart, and the Military






Senate hopeful Catherine Cortez Masto really, really doesn’t want to say anything about the Iran deal

Senate hopeful Catherine Cortez Masto really, really doesn’t want to say anything about the Iran deal

I have tried, most recently as a week ago and got this from her campaign: “Still reviewing the agreement.”

Even after Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid came out for it last weekend, his would-be successor is still mum. (Of course, Prince Harry says her position doesn’t matter. Yes, why should she take a stand on one of the most important foreign policy agreements in history. Hardly relevant, right, senator?)

The latest person to try, a tracker for the GOP SuperPac America Rising, was met with no words, except from an aide who told the tracker: “We’re going in to eat,” outside the Red Rock Democratic Club”s Wednesday evening barbecue.

This is a tough one for Cortez Masto. She could part ways with her patron, Reid, and the president, thus showing independence from them. Or she could do what most Democrats have done.

Civil War Is Obama’s Endgame For America

Survivalist expert, author and radio host Steve Quayle also gives his take on border security, the military’s Jade Helm exercises and more. We’ll also take your calls on today’s global transmission.………

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family:

Obama to speak at Reid energy summit

corporate_obama32President Barack Obama will be the keynote speaker at the National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas sponsored by U.S. Sen. Harry Reid.

The two Democrats will join business leaders, politicians, students and other interested parties to discuss renewable resources in America. The summit is in its eighth year and will be held Aug. 24 at the Mandalay Bay Resort.

“I have so much affection and admiration for President Obama and we are thrilled to welcome him to participate in this year’s summit,” Reid said in a statement. “President Obama’s record on clean energy and climate stands above all others. His administration has made the largest investment in clean energy in American history and there is no place better than Nevada to discuss how we will continue this progress.”harry reid

The event will also feature Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, former Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Nevada System of Higher Education Chancellor Dan Klaich.

Obama’s visit is timed during an election year when Reid, the highest-ranking member of the Senate, is not running for reelection. Reid endorsed Catherine Cortez Masto, the former Nevada Attorney General, in April. Cortez Masto will face U.S. Rep. Joe Heck, R-Henderson, in November 2016.

Breaking News! MSNBC Breaks Hidden Records/Obama Birth Issue Live! “Trump Requested Records” (Video)

By King of Shambhala  (I announce the Apocalypse and Revelation as a Buddhist reluctantly delving into the Christian Apocalypse as a Messenger of it.)

I’m revealing the APOCALYPSE NOW.

Breaking News! MSNBC breaks Obama hidden records/birth certificate issue LIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Morning Joe Interviews Trump on Gun Free Zones and more

At 6:50: Mark Halperin: “You made a big point of asking for Obama’s college records!”

Nevada monument creation an Obama overreach, Bush says

CARSON CITY —€” Republican presidential hopeful Jeb Bush said Friday that the designation of the Basin and Range National Monument signed by President Barack Obama was an overreach of executive power that he opposed.

‘€œI don‘€™t think expanding narrowing use of public lands is appropriate,”€ Bush told reporters, referring to the new federal monument in a remote area of Lincoln and Nye counties.

His remarks followed a town hall campaign event in the state capital.

“There‘s ways you can build consensus to protect the natural environment and allow people to access their land.”

In remarks to about 200 people at the Silver State Charter School, Bush covered a wide-range of issues, from school choice to immigration.

He also distanced himself from GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, saying Republicans can‘€™t hope to win back the White House with divisive comments.

“If conservatives are going to win we need to be on the side of everybody,”€ he said, though he never mentioned Trump by name.

Bush plans to campaign in Las Vegas on Friday night.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Contact Sandra Chereb at or 775-687-3901. Find her on Twitter: @SandraChereb

Surprised no one assassinated this fucker yet: Obama Asserts Dominion Over Creeks, Streams, Wetlands and Even Big Puddles

obama joker President Obama’s administration on Wednesday claimed dominion over all of America’s streams, creeks, rills, ditches, brooks, rivulets, burns, tributaries, criks, wetlands — perhaps even puddles — in a sweeping move to assert unilateral federal authority.

The Environmental Protection Agency, along with the Army Corps of Engineers, says it has the authority to control all waterways within the United States — and will exercise that authority.

Read more:…

Obama Told These Brave Marines to STOP PRAYING, But They Did This Instead!

Time and again, President Barack Obama and his radical administration has tried to silence Christians in the military. Chaplains are not allowed to speak their mind, and secularism is mandated from the White House.

guns and godThis is outrageous! Our troops put their lives on the line to protect us, and should be free to express their religious beliefs. This is a Christian nation, and we need God’s help to keep our nation safe!

But the Marines will not give up their Bible! As Conservative Post notes, here is one great example of Marines joining together and singing about Jesus Christ. As the song goes, “Open the eyes of my heart Lord, I want to see you.”

While this will infuriate Obama, it is music to our ears:

Heads Up! Obama Puts A Gag On Any Talk About the TPP, Contains UN Gun Control

The Obama administration is feverishly working with foreign lawmakers and officials on a new Trans-Pacific Parternship (TPP) trade agreement. Yet what may seem like business as usual is anything but.

The President has made it a point to keep any details of the agreement completely secret, so much so that what amounts to a gag order has been placed on anyone who has anything to do with the bill. Even members of Congress are unable to discuss the contents of the bill with each other or in public, and anyone who is invited to discussions over the bill must leave cell phones and staff members behind. Since not even Republicans have yet to spill the beans about the details of the agreement, one can only assume that those attending the meetings are doing so under threat of criminal prosecution or worse if they talk.

This, of course, begs the question: What is so important to the Obama administration that it has to be kept secret from the American public until after the agreement has been passed?

What could possibly be so critical to national security that the purportedly “most transparent” Presidential administration in history says no one can talk about it?……

Gangbanger Charged With Murder, Drug Crimes Gets Obama Amnesty

obama jokerIn the latest scandal to rock President Obama’s controversial executive amnesty initiative, a known gang member charged with murder and drug-related crimes was shielded from deportation under the administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

The illegal immigrant’s name is Emmanuel Jesus Rangel-Hernandez and he was in the process of being deported when U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) shielded him from removal under DACA, even though the agency knew he was a member of a violent street gang. USCIS was also aware that Rangel-Hernandez had been arrested in 2012 for possession of drugs but rubber-stamped his amnesty petition anyways last August.

Earlier this year, months after our commander-in-chief granted him amnesty, the 19-year-old gangbanger was charged with four counts of first-degree murder in connection with a three-day shooting spree in Charlotte, North Carolina. One of the victims was a model who appeared in a popular reality television show, according to a local news report that confirms authorities knew Rangel-Hernandez was listed in a federal database as a gang member when they approved his amnesty. Under DACA illegal immigrants are also rewarded with work permits.

This month the Homeland Security agency implementing Obama’s massive amnesty program admitted that the gangbanger’s “DACA request and related employment authorization should not have been approved.” Americans would never know about this egregious case if it weren’t made public by a federal lawmaker who demanded answers from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The legislator, Iowa Senator Charles Grassley, chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee and has long expressed concern about how individuals who are allowed to remain in the U.S. under Obama’s deferred action are vetted. Earlier this year the senator pressed USCIS for information related to the process and, specifically, about Rangel-Hernandez.

A few days ago the agency responded by admitting that it erroneously shielded Rangel-Hernandez from deportation considering his criminal history and gang ties. In a letter to Senator Grassley, USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez writes that “based upon the derogatory information in the background check, the outcome of the resolution process and final decision did not comply with USCIS policy.” The agency’s Background Check Unit (BCU) should deny consideration of DACA for a known street gang member, the letter confirms, further stating that “given the fact that the individual was identified as a known gang member, his request should have been denied by the adjudicator.”

But it wasn’t denied and that creates many questions about the process. It’s bad enough that the administration is rewarding millions who have entered the country illegally with all sorts of benefits, but now we must wonder how many dangerous criminals are benefitting from this broad amnesty. The newspaper report cited above says that federal authorities have since found 13 other cases in the same crime database of people who were approved for protection from deportation. This means that, more than likely, there are a lot more. Unfortunately, the public may never hear about them until they commit a serious crime.

GOP Congressman: Obama “Getting Close” To Impeachment

“People say, ‘should the president be impeached?’ I say, we’re getting close to that.”


Obama-muslimRepublican Rep. Tom Marino of Pennsylvania says President Obama is “getting close” to impeachment.

“People say, ‘should the president be impeached?’ I say, we’re getting close to that,” the Marino said in a video posted on YouTube Wednesday by the local newspaper, the Wellsboro Gazette.

Marino said he was talking about impeachment because “it comes up consistently at town hall meetings.”

Of Attorney General Eric Holder, Marino said he also was “approaching impeachment.”

“I think when an attorney general says, ‘I am not enforcing the law that I took the oath to enforce,’ that’s approaching impeachment.”

Marino explained earlier he was against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, saying it should be used sparingly and only when there is a constitutional violation.

“I don’t think we should be using impeachment just because we do not like a president or an attorney general, or anybody else that’s elected.”

Marino has said previously that he wanted to impeach the Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.

Every Governor & State AG Received Sheriff Arpaio’s Obama Forgery Findings

The video at the bottom tells about all elected officials of the USA that have received the Sheriff’s Kits that reveal all of Joe Arpaio’s investigation about Obama’s birth certificate.

In this first link, Democrats are signalling they are expecting a defeat in Texas in the court of Judge Andrew Hanen’s ruling on Obama’s Amnesty order.

The racist liberal haters are expecting defeat and are trying to discredit the ruling in advance.


Obama Amnesty Lawsuit Cites Variety Of Arguments — Some Of Them Wild



Mr. Obama’s defenders sounded confident that his policy would be upheld last year, but some now seem resigned to defeat — at least in the first round in Judge Hanen’s court.

“Next week, we anticipate a preliminary ruling in the case and we expect Judge Hanen to rule in favor of the plaintiffs,” said Marshall Fitz, vice president of immigration policy at the Center for American Progress, who accused Texas of court-shopping to get a biased judge. “While we hold out hope that legal reasoning will prevail over the judge’s personal bias, no one will be surprised by a preliminary ruling for the plaintiffs.”


The Texas case is the leading drama, but it’s not the only court challenge that could upend the president.

File:Sheriff Joe Arpaio.jpg

Sheriff Joe Arpaio has joined the Texas lawsuit too while at the same time, his own lawsuit on Obama’s Amnesty is before the Supreme Court now.

• Sheriff Arpaio’s lawsuit was rejected by a judge in the District of Columbia on the grounds that he didn’t show an actual injury. Sheriff Arpaio has appealed and the circuit court in Washington is gathering legal briefs for that case.

• A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled Mr. Obama’s policy unconstitutional, although it was for a specific case involving a single illegal immigrant who was deported then sneaked back into the U.S. The judge did not order the policy vacated. The illegal immigrant has made the case moot by pleading guilty to the re-entry charge. He said he didn’t want to be involved in a test case and would rather be deported to Honduras, where he can begin to work again to support his family.

• At least two female lawyers at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have filed discrimination cases arguing that they were punished in part because they insisted on pursuing deportation cases against illegal immigrants despite their superiors’ efforts to get them to drop them.

• ICE agents and officers have sued, arguing that the various memos ordering them to release illegal immigrants without charging them violates a part of federal law that lays out their duties. A federal judge in Texas agreed with the agents but ruled that he didn’t have jurisdiction because it was a job matter. He referred the case to a personnel board…..

Meanwhile, Joe Arpaio’s investigation is being spread to all elected officals in the USA via a “Sheriff’s Kit” mailing. Practically all elected officials have it now. Now it’s their duty to sue Obama and defeat that fraud by all legal means which are at their disposition.

Obama is Covering Up Something Massive-This Will Literally Put the World in Danger! One of the Biggest Nightmares Yet! (Shocking Videos)

obama jokerI love and support Israel, do not get me wrong here. However, there are Zionists who are called Jews, however, they are not really Jews…they are communists and evil! 

There are all sorts of Jews, however, the Zionist (Jews) are not at all what the Bible is speaking of when it speaks of “Jews”. Zionists are a member of the Illuminati, global elite.  They are Godless and wicked.

I just wanted to mention my personal stand on this topic in relation to Israel and the Jews. Judaism is a religion and Zionists are a political, Godless, Illuminati, NWO organization run by pure evil.

For more on this topic, read Randy DeMain’s books: Nephilim Agenda, Nephilim Resurgence, as they go into much detail about this, as well as the Illuminati government system. Randy DeMain is a die-hard Israel supporter/lover and born again, Spirit filled Christian, as am I! Also, I DO NOT agree with dividing Israel or them giving up their land!  

Again, Zionist=Communist, Government, political organization who call themselves Jews but are NOT true Jews! —Lyn Leahz, quote from below article

To get the full information intended, please check out all the videos posted below!  The last video is just plain sickening!


YouTube Commentary:

This is amazing. He may not be the first Black president, we don’t even know who is Father really is. But, it might be that we don’t know who his Mother is either. We do not know the facts, we only know that the trail leads to something very well hidden.

We know there is definitely a cover up. That is enough. Our presidents must show all the records. It is the LAW!

It seems there have been many things being done illegal, and no one cares. Our government is run like an underground Mafia, it is far more corrupt than a third world government, and far more obvious, but as we said, no one cares. Do you? Please get this video out and lets try to let everyone know. We must get the word out.

Obama Meets Half Jewish Brother

Why has this article from Washington Post been removed?  CLICK HERE first National Jewish Democratic Council  Then, look here at this screenshot for verification. You will see an image from the below video that shows the article. However, when you follow the link to the article from the NJDC, it has been removed! Follow the link provided in the NJDC article, or you can click here to see that it has been removed.  Some major censorship going on here, by the way.

I love and support Israel, do not get me wrong here. However, there are Zionists who are called Jews, however, they are not really Jews…they are communists and evil! There are all sorts of Jews, however, the Zionist (Jews) are not at all what the Bible is speaking of when it speaks of “Jews”. Zionists are a member of the Illuminati, global elite.  They are Godless and wicked.  I just wanted to mention my personal stand on this topic in relation to Israel and the Jews. Judaism is a religion and Zionists are a political, Godless, Illuminati, NWO organization run by pure evil. Also, I DO NOT agree with dividing Israel or them giving up their land!


Today there is much confusion among Jews over the meaning of the term Zionism. It means different things to different people. The reason for this is that historically, Zionism has been a movement dominated by secularist Jews. Herzl and most of his colleagues were assimilated Jews, who did not believe in or practice the Torah. Some Zionists were vehemently anti-religious, and saw the Torah and mitzvos as outdated rituals with no place in their modern state.

To read in more detail about just how evil Zionism really is, and that it is not what most of you think (most of us think Zionism means to support Israel and the return of the Jews to their homeland. In fact, if you google this, that is mostly what will come up. However, the true meaning of zionism revolves around near-communism and sheer Godlessness!  CLICK HERE


Below Video: Obama the Muslim Lover and Israel Hater: This is a few years old, but, read between the lines now that you have watched the above videos. What are your thoughts? Is this viewpoint correct? Are you confused now? Or is the above more true than we care to believe? You decide!

Why do Jews still vote Obama?

Obama Is Not Muslim—He’s An ILLUMINATI Liar Who Plays the Field–Zionist?

From 2008….this literally makes me want to vomit!!!! Remember, these are not TRUE Jews! They are Zionists! Remember what I shared regarding the true meaning of the word zionist! I used to call myself a Zionist, thinking it meant a supporter of Israel. But it does not mean that at all as you think!

Jewish Americans for Obama

Why Obama’s Cybersecurity Plan May Not Make Americans Safer


No foreign nation, no hacker, should be able to shut down our networks, steal our trade secrets, or invade the privacy of American families, especially our kids. We are making sure our government integrates intelligence to combat cyber threats, just as we have done to combat terrorism. And tonight, I urge this Congress to finally pass the legislation we need to better meet the evolving threat of cyber-attacks, combat identity theft, and protect our children’s information.

It was a rallying cry for greater “cybersecurity.” But according to many security experts, “security” and the specific cybersecurity proposal the president unveiled last week could be a pretext for expanded, unchecked surveillance that may not actually make the nation safer. The ideas in the proposal face no strong political resistance especially since the information-collection organism would not be the government itself but rather private companies reporting user information to the government.

What prompted the inclusion of cybersecurity in the address? The president has been restrained in his discussions of what some consider to be the most significant cyber attack on a U.S. entity in recent memory, the Sony hack. (Sony Pictures is a sub unit of Sony America and is still ultimately part of the Sony parent company, which is Japanese.) Obama called the hack an act of “cyber vandalism” not tantamount to war.

But in the days leading up to the State of the Union address, the Obama administration released a cybersecurity proposal, which will be sent to Congress, that speaks directly to the Sony incident. The key component of the proposal is, indeed, “integration.” Specifically, it affords private companies liability protection to share information with the Homeland Security Department’s National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center.

The chief of the NSA’s Tailored Access Division Robert Joyce, has described the Sony hack as a key moment that will fundamentally change the way the United States deals with the murky threat posed by shadowy enemies with laptops.  It was, in popular if clichéd Washington, D.C., parlance, “a game changer.” Joyce was not alone in that assessment.

“We had seen cyber attacks but we’ve never seen a nation-state…destroy data,” former Michael Rogers, a Republican representative from Michigan, told a group at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington, D.C., last week. It was that willful destruction of data, as opposed to simply theft, that elevated the Sony hack to an incident more urgent than any of the recent high-profile attacks that had affected major corporations, which were aimed primarily at the theft of data for narrow, mercantile purposes.

Rogers, a seven-term congressman, has indicated he would be leaving the House for greener (sounding) pastures in radio. But during his tenure, where he served as the head of the House Intelligence Committee, he earned a reputation as one the National Security Agency’s most stalwart allies at the agency’s moment of greatest shame.

The bill that perhaps best characterized that reputation, H.R. 3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, never actually became law, having stalled in the Senate after passing the House. It would have granted liability protections to corporations that would then be able to share that information with the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security.

It was an idea that predates Rogers and CISPA—in 2008, the Bush White House put out National Security Presidential Directive – 54 that outlined the U.S. interest in information sharing in the name of cybersecurity. But it was Rogers who refined it and pushed to enshrine it in legislation.

CISPA would give companies the freedom to share user data with the DHS where the info could then go to virtually any other law enforcement agency for use in any investigation related to crimes from drug trafficking to copyright infringement. It sent a clear message to some of America’s biggest companies: “We need you to do our spying for us.”

Privacy advocates argued that the bill’s language was too broad. It would allow every company from Google to Apple to Facebook to share information on their users with the government outside of the parameters of the Electronics Communications Privacy Act as well as the Wiretap Act.

In April 2012, the president vowed that if the bill made it to his desk, he would veto it: “Cybersecurity and privacy are not mutually exclusive. Moreover, information sharing, while an essential component of comprehensive legislation, is not alone enough to protect the Nation’s core critical infrastructure from cyber threats. Accordingly, the Administration strongly opposes H.R. 3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, in its current form.”

Last week, Americans watched much of that resolve wither away. The proposal that the president rolled out shares a lot in common with CISPA with one exception: It purports to anonymize data. But the White House proposal would still allow for the sharing of user data with the government outside of privacy laws.

What sort of information does the new proposal promise to share, or rather integrate? In a call with reporters, a White House official said that the information would “primarily” not be content.

Shareable information does include anything that falls under the category of cyber threat indicator, which includes any data relating to “malicious reconnaissance, including communications that reasonably appear to be transmitted for the purpose of gathering technical information related to a cyber threat,” which could mean everything from attempting to access restricted files to—possibly—asking fairly routine questions about how a site runs or what a company does with user data.

“The White House proposal relies heavily on privacy guidelines that are currently unwritten. What these guidelines say and when they are applied will be critical to protecting Internet users. Privacy protections and use restrictions must be in effect before information sharing occurs,” Harley Geiger, the senior counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology said in a press releasefollowing the announcement.

Other privacy advocates were quick to call the proposal unnecessary, as companies can already share information related to threats with the government (but within the parameters of the Privacy Act). More disturbing for many in the technology community was a provision in the legislation to amend RICO laws in a way that could charge hackers, computer scientists, or just curious users with felonies just for finding—or searching for—security errors in web sites or services.

Jeff Moss, the founder of the famous Black Hat and DEFCON conference, expressed such concern to Defense One. Every year Black Hat and DEFCON bring together thousands of hackers from around the world to showcase their research into cyber vulnerabilities. The events together comprise the one of the best forums to expose such vulnerabilities.

“I do worry about its chilling effects if enacted into law. Unless there is a carve out for research, the liability for clicking on links to security tools alone is worrying…even more so if RICO style laws are applied due to their broad nature and potential for abuse by aggressive prosecutors. We have had many decades to get used to prosecuting organized crime, but prosecuting technical computer crime is newer and harder to explain to juries. In that regard clear and easy to understand ‘red lines’ while more simplistic might be a better place to start,” said Moss.

In other words, the legislation could actually make the Internet less secure by criminalizing research into vulnerabilities.

Mark Jaycox, of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, concurred that provisions in the legislation may “chill the computer security research that is a central part of our best defense against computer crime.” Jaycox writes that the legislation could make you a felon for “sharing your HBO GO password.” He adds that “the expansion of the definition may impact researchers who commonly scan public websites to detect potential vulnerabilities. These researchers should not have to face a felony charge if a prosecutor thinks they should have known the site prohibited scanning.”

The single section that makes the White House proposal somewhat more palatable than CISPA is the provision demanding that user data “establish a process to anonymize and safeguard information.”

But anonymization may offer false reassurance. In fact, researchers have shown that anonymization in data is something of a joke. In a 2013 paper published in the Nature Scientific Reports, MIT researchers Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye and César A. Hidalgo, discuss an experiment where they took a random sample of 1.5 million cell users over 15 months and found that, when locational cellphone data is anonymized, just four data points—information created by the anonymous user—was enough to effectively reveal the users’ identity 95 percent of the time.

“I agree, 100 percent. The way the data comes in, there isn’t a whole lot of benefit. Why make a law that says anonymize it,” said Robert Twitchell, CEO of Dispersive Technologies.

One of the key benefits of sharing cyber information with other investigative bodies is affixing attribution, which permanent anonymization would undermine.

Moreover, the information that the public shares with the DHS, if it is in fact related to some future cybersecurity event, would likely be shared with the NSA. According to the White House, that sharing, or integration, would be “as close to real time as possible.”

How do we know that the NSA would be one of—if not the—main recipient? Remember when the Federal Bureau of Investigation expressed a high degree of confidence that the attack could be attributed to North Korea? You could be forgiven for thinking that it was, in fact, the FBI that reached that conclusion. But according torecently revealed documents, the NSA did the work.

As David Sanger and Martin Fackler report in The New York Times, the NSA was accessing North Korean networks, communications, and cyber operations for years prior to the Sony hack. That’s what allowed the United States to so quickly attribute the attacks to North Korea, though many still claim the U.S. is overlooking evidence of an inside job. But it wasn’t enough to allow them to actually stop the attack.

Not every lawmaker agrees that the Sony hack serves as justification for an information sharing bill, especially one that could put people’s privacy in danger. Zoe Lofgren, a Democratic representative from California who represents parts of San Jose (Silicon Valley) told The Hill: “I fear we may have taken the wrong lesson from these recent high-profile attacks. These attacks were not the result of a missed opportunity to share information, but rather caused by substantial and obvious security failures and a culture of treating cyber security as an afterthought.”

At the Bipartisan Policy Center event, former Central Intelligence Agency director Michael Hayden bullishly predicted that some form of information sharing would pass this year. Both political and public concerns about privacy and overreaching agencies have given way to worries about lost data and remotely hijacked infrastructure. “We are entering the post-Snowden era,” he claimed.

Rogers himself was more cautious but he acknowledged that the involvement of the president in passing cyber-sharing legislation was a “significant change,” possibly enough to push something through.

Will Hurd, a Republican representative from Texas, told Defense One that the president’s comments during the State of the Union suggest a softening on CISPA: “I’m hoping that the president’s comments suggest he’s not going to veto CISPA. I think this is an area that the president and Congress can work together.” Hurd, a former CIA operative, is considered a rising star specifically on issues related to cybersecurity.

Hurd, however, has also expressed some hesitation about some of the more hawkish elements of the proposal. In discussing the potential changes in RICO law, he was dim on any proposal that might harm cybersecurity research. “We don’t want to limit that. I think Black Hat is a very helpful forum where you have all of this research, they’re looking at the cutting edge procedures in this space. It’s a great forum for understanding where it’s going on. This is one of those areas where reasonable people can be reasonable people.”

Following the event at the Bipartisan Policy Center, Rogers loitered for a bit to glad-hand friends and fans who wished him well in his new career. As he got on to an elevator, Defense One asked him if he felt at all validated that the president’s proposal so closely resembled Rogers’s bill, the one that the president had vowed to veto. Rogers looked off into the distance and smiled wistfully. “Success has many fathers,” he said as the doors closed in front of him.


CIA Spy: Alien Contact To Be Announced By Obama; Secret Deal With Putin/China Over Dollar Collapse

Ronald Reagan once famously wondered what would happen if the world were presented with the prospect of an alien invasion. It was Reagan’s belief that humanity would be able to put aside all of their differences and come together to oppose such a common threat. We may soon see if he was correct.

If the accomplishments of the Obama administration can be summed up in three words, those words would be failure, scandal, and treason. The president and his toadies had to repeatedly lie to the people of the United States in order to pass the massive fail known as Obamacare, they have been lying to the American people and stonewalling Congress over what really happened in Benghazi for the last 18 months, and they are currently lying and/or pleading the fifth over the IRS’s targeting of Tea Party groups. Let’s not forget “Operation Fast and Furious,” NSA spying on American citizens, the targeting of journalists, unconstitutional recess appointments, illegal military actions in Libya, and the unconstitutional and extrajudicial killings of Anwar al-Alawki, Samir Khan, and al-Alawki’s 16-year-old son Abdulrahman who was killed in the CIA drone strike two weeks after his father for no particular reason.

Bill Clinton Talks About The Coming FAKE Alien Invasion

Talk of impeachment is rampant in the halls of Congress, ordinary Americans are waking up all across the country; and they are angry. Even liberals are beginning to see the dangers posed by Barack Obama. Liberal constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley says that the United States is in a “constitutional crisis,” and the ACLU has called Obama “judge, jury and executioner.”

The last time there were anti-Obama protests in Washington DC, 1.8 million bikers roared through the town and patriots tore down the “Barrycades” that were preventing the nation’s heroes from reaching their monuments; the ones that they earned with their sweat, their devotion to country, and their blood. When protesters started marching towards the White House Obama got into Marine One and fled the nation’s capital. Obama desperately needs a win to avoid impeachment and conviction by the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors against the people of the United States.

According to former CIA spy Dr. Jim Garrow, Obama intends to quash all of the scandals plaguing his administration by announcing to the world that humanity has been in contact with extraterrestrials, and that he (Obama) has been selected to speak for humanity. Garrow says that this announcement will be timed to come after an imminent currency collapse orchestrated by Russia and China in a secret deal approved by Obama, who has not given up on his plans to wipe out up to 300 million Americans with an electromagnetic pulse – a triple threat from a POTUS known to double-down when his back is against the wall.

An EMP would send the US back to the 1800’s without the infrastructure to support 314 million people. Overnight those people would be too busy trying to stay alive, too busy fighting hunger and disease to fight the absolute tyranny Obama and his masters seek to impose on the United States. With the nation crippled after attacks from numerous vectors, including terrorist attacks within the US perpetrated by Chinese, North Korean, and Iranian terrorists, Obama intends to complete his stranglehold on the country by asking for UN forces to keep the peace and suppress dissent. The irony is that those forces will be made up largely of our communist and Muslim enemies. I suppose we’ll be busy fighting them too.

Obama’s plan to set off an EMP last fall was thwarted by three brave flag and general officers of the United States military, men in charge of our nuclear security, who were subsequently fired from their positions when they refused to give Obama access to those weapons. According to Dr. Garrow, one of the weapons Obama tried to steal was detonated at sea in the Atlantic Ocean causing a 2.2 magnitude earthquake that was verified by the US Geological Survey. Two more weapons are still under the control of patriotic members of the United States military.

This exciting episode is one that you do not want to miss.

Sandoval approves of U.S. Senate passing Nevada land bills

brian-sandoval-bongRENO, Nev. — After more than five years of wrangling, the U.S. Senate has passed a bipartisan package of land bills to promote economic development in northern Nevada while protecting some unspoiled sites as wilderness areas.

“The passage of this important legislation will have a direct impact on all Nevadans. This bill will open the door to economic development, job creation, mining, ranching, and protect some of Nevada’s treasured lands which will preserve our state for its next generation of citizens,” Gov. Brian Sandoval, R-NV said. “I would like to thank the members of our Congressional delegation who supported the NDAA and hope for a swift signature from President Obama so all Nevadans can begin to enjoy the benefits of this significant bill.”

The Senate’s action follows the House’s approval of the bill last week. The legislation, included in a defense spending bill, now goes to President Barack Obama for his signature.

One of the measures allows the sale of some 10,000 acres of federal land to Yerington to support development of Nevada Copper Corp.’s mine and other industrial projects while creating the 48,000-acre Wovoka Wilderness.

Another bill sets aside 26,000 acres northwest of Winnemucca as the Pine Forest Range Wilderness while allowing nearby ranchers to secure land exchanges with the government to ensure their economic future.

The Associated Press helped with the writing of this story.

The decline of the American century, 1914-2014

Illustration on comparisons between Barack Obama and Woodrow Wilson by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times
Illustration on comparisons between Barack Obama and Woodrow Wilson by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times more >
– – Sunday, December 7, 2014

On this date in 1914, in his second annual address to Congress, President Wilson signaled to the world that the significant role that his White House predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt, had carved out for the United States as a strong military power was being relinquished. No matter that TR had built up the American Navy and displayed it on a global cruise in 1907, Wilson, at the beginning of World War I, washed his hands of a strong presence abroad.

“We are, indeed,” he said in his message, “a true friend to all nations of the world, because we threaten none, covet the possessions of none, desire the overthrow of none. Our friendship can be accepted and is accepted without reservation, because it is offered in a spirit and for a purpose which no one need ever question or suspect. Therein lies our greatness. We are the champions of peace and of concord.”

The result of Wilson’s naivete was that the United States entered the war too late to have an effect on an Allied victory instead of a mushy armistice, with the resulting peace treaty marred by Wilson’s wishful thinking — embodied in his highfalutin Fourteen Points. Indeed, Wilson got just what he campaigned for, namely, “peace without victory,” an untenable solution to Europe’s woes. Little wonder that the vacuum in exerting power politics resulted in Adolf Hitler’s challenge to world order within two decades.

Like President Obama, Wilson had absolutely no experience in foreign policy. As a university professor, he specialized in political science, a field not too distant from Mr. Obama’s constitutional law professorship.

Both men would win a Nobel Peace Prize because their rhetoric was strong-sounding, just the opposite of TR’s diminution of words in favor of military strength (“Walk softly but carry a big stick”). Recall that TR won a Nobel Prize, too, but it was for action, not rhetoric, by mediating in 1905 in Concord, New Hampshire, an end to the Russo-Japanese War, artfully sticking it to both sides by requiring them to withdraw from disputed territory.

Even after the British luxury liner, the Lusitania, was sunk by German submarines in May 1915, killing more than 1,000 passengers, including Americans, Wilson preferred fatuous comments to sensible action: “There is such a thing as a man being too proud to fight. There is such a thing as a nation being so right that it does not need to convince others by force that it is right.”

To be sure, American entry into World War II put an end to such nonsense, and the nation became the world leader, utilizing a simple, but powerful strategy, namely, “unconditional surrender” to impose on the Axis powers. Subsequently, with the rise of the Soviet Union as a nuclear threat to world disorder,

American presidents of both parties adhered to the sensible argument of diplomat, George Kennan, to the effect that Soviet force be met with counterforce, eventually leading to the defusing of Soviet aggression. Although President Eisenhower in his “Farewell Address” worried about the growing military-industrial complex in the Cold War, the union ensured both peace and prosperity.

The tragedy of the Obama administration is that it has not only turned its back on the tradition of the United States as the leading nation to promote world order but that it has criticized that legacy, even offering apologies for our history. To Mr. Obama, foreign policy consists of his touring the world, meeting with national leaders, coming home, and interpreting his unctuous, sashaying tour as a tour de force. His guiding light in dealing with adversaries, such as Iran, is concession, so as to effect a deal, no matter that it may not be in the best interests of the United States.

Perhaps worst of all, the insecure Mr. Obama, like Wilson, chose a weak vice president so as not to be upstaged at home and abroad. Wilson was saddled with Thomas R. Marshall of Indiana as his No. 2, best known for his remark: “What this country needs is a really good 5 cent cigar.” Mr. Obama’s veep, Joe Biden, in spite of his long service on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has been an embarrassment in his travels abroad, with his wayward mouth contributing to his being viewed as the court jester to the Obama administration.

Little wonder that 53 percent of Americans, in a Gallup poll earlier this year, believed that other countries across the world don’t respect Mr. Obama.

Thomas V. DiBacco is professor emeritus at American University.

Read more:
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Obama Coup Already In Play? ‘O’s Time In Office Coming To An Abrupt End?

As the three videos below clearly point out, the removal of Barack Obama from office in a staged-coup may already be in play. This thread points out each of these videos from the past several months issue warnings that Barack Obama’s time in office may soon be coming to an abrupt end. Will a staged race war in America lead to a staged military coup in the near future? In this 1st video, beginning at the 50 minute mark Dr. Jim Willie speculates that Obama may have already been told his time in office is up, leading to great stress, isolation and boozing. In the 2nd video, at the 2 hour 9 minute mark, Eric Jon Phelps tells the Hagmann and Hagmann Report what may soon be coming including the invasion of Israel and the further subjucation of the American people while in the 3rd video, Phelps elaborates more beginning at 55 minutes in. 

Get Obama Toilet Paper For That Special Someone On Your Christmas Giving List!


Not satisfied in terms of having used it satisfied, but satisfied that it is as good as it was advertised as being!

Want your own roll or want to buy one as a gift for someone special? Just click on this link…

Get Obama Toilet Paper For That Special Someone On Your Christmas Giving List!

Prepare Yourself For 2016!
Get Your Hillary Toilet Paper Today! Just Click On Her Face…


U.S. National Debt Soars to $18 Trillion Under Obama

By on December 1, 2014

The U.S. national debt hit $18 trillion for the first time on Friday, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

A website that tracks the national debt said it rose to $18.005 trillion, a jump of more than $40 billion from two days prior. There was no figure given for Thanksgiving, a holiday.

Screen Shot 2014-12-01 at 4.54.55 PMImage:

While Republicans have made a point of saying they would use their new control of Congress to fight Obamacare and ease federal regulations, they have also made a point of saying debt reduction is critical.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Congress must take steps to pare back “a national debt that has Americans stealing from their children and grandchildren, robbing them of benefits that they will never see and leaving them with burdens that will be nearly impossible to repay.”

The national debt has soared nearly 70 percent under President Barack Obama. When he took office, it stood at $10.626 trillion, and it’s risen nearly $7.5 trillion under Obama.

The annual budget deficit was above $1 trillion in each of the first four years of Obama’s presidency. The budget deficit was just over $500 billion in the last fiscal year, but it’s expected to grow again if no changes to current law are made.

According to the government, national debt held by the public now stands at $12.922 trillion, and intergovernmental holdings — which reflects government borrowings against certain federal programs — are just over $5 trillion.

– See more at:

Obama Vows To Shut Down Government Over Amnesty

Obama: Fund My Amnesty Or I’ll Shut Down The Government

President Barack Obama speaks at a news conference at the conclusion of the G20 Summit in Brisbane Nov. 16, 2014. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Daily Caller


White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Monday that President Barack Obama will block a government budget bill if the GOP denies him the funds needed to provide amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.

“Yes,” Earnest said when asked by ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl if Obama would veto a government-wide budget that defunded the amnesty program.

If Obama blocks the budget to help the illegals, large sections of the federal government would shut down on Dec. 12.

But Earnest equivocated when he was asked if Obama would shut down the government if the GOP denies amnesty just for the immigration agency.

“I don’t believe that members of Congress or the majority of members of Congress, will go along with efforts to shut down the govern in protest over the president’s executive actions on immigration,” he said.

Any veto would be a high-risk step by Obama, because it would brand the Democratic Party as willing to shut down the government to aid several million illegal immigrants.

Read More Here

D.C. Whispers: Barack Obama “Isolated, Insolent, & Inebriated”

For some time now there have been various reports suggesting Barack Obama to be, even by typical U.S. presidential standards, an aloof  character with seemingly few friends and even less personal interest in things and events outside of himself. Now entering his next to last year as President of the United States, rumors are circulating via Capitol Hill sources of a man lost in his own manufactured past who is desperate to be free of a White House he loathes, and an America he despises even more.

Apparently the day to day White House staff are seeing less and less of Barack Obama. When in Washington D.C., the president rarely goes beyond his private residence study, even including fewer of his beloved golf outings.

Day to day operations are channeled through Jarrett’s office, and it is that longstanding rule that has Congressional Democrats seething. Jarrett often ignores requests to speak with here – even if such a request comes from figures like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. One Democrat who was recently deemed worthy of the Senior White House Adviser’s attention was Senator Chuck Schumer who recently declared during a public speech that Obamacare was a mistake for the party, in essence a problem that should not have taken up so much of the party’s time in 2009 and 2010.

Read More Here

Obama Says “We Are Remaking The Courts”

What does Obama mean by “remaking the courts?” Is that like fundamentally transforming America?

Here’s the full quote for context via a transcript:

We were able to reform our financial system so that the likelihood of taxpayer-funded bailouts is a lot less than it was. We were able to expand funding for young people going to college. We were able to expand national service for young people who want to serve. We fought long and hard for consumer protections that weren’t there before.

As Lisa mentioned, we are remaking the courts. I know that we’ve got some lawyers here, and here in Texas sometimes people feel a little frustrated about the pace of appointments here in Texas. But you should know that in addition to the Supreme Court, we’ve been able to nominate and confirm judges of extraordinary quality all across the country on federal benches. We’re actually, when it comes to the district court, matching the pace of previous Presidents. When it comes to the appellate court, we’re just a little bit behind, and we’re just going to keep on focused on it.

President Barack Obama has made it official: he’s “remaking the courts.”

At a private fundraiser for liberal Democratic donors at a DSCC (Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee) event on Nov. 6, Obama said, “we are remaking the courts.”

Only presidents nominate judges to the three levels of the federal judiciary: 94 district courts (for trials), the 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court. Thus, every president makes a very significant impact on the third branch of government, and those appointments—most especially to the Supreme Court—are a defining aspect of each president’s legacy.

There are serious implications in choosing to say he’s “remaking the courts.” That indicates the President is not just replacing retiring judges with new judges; he is instead fundamentally changing the philosophical balance of the courts.

It’s Obama’s right and prerogative to try to remake the courts. At least he understands the importance of the courts and takes seriously the constitutional power to make judicial appointments. Not all presidents have been as focused on this constitutional duty to staff the entire third branch of the federal government.

Obama is seeking to use that power to advance his far-left vision of what America should be, one in which government plays a central role in people’s lives; with a centrally-planned economy; strict and comprehensive government regulation; the redistribution of wealth through massive economic entitlements; and a militantly secular culture where government dictates truth, defines moral values, and is a pivotal influence on raising the next generation.

President Obama understands that so much of what he wants to accomplish runs afoul of the historical understanding of the limits on federal power and the proper meaning of the Bill of Rights that he can only achieve that agenda if a critical mass of federal judges agree with his idea that the words of the Constitution can be completely redefined (i.e., effectively ignored) to grant such sweeping and transformational power to the federal government. He is seeking to remake the courts to share his philosophy of what the Constitution means to enact his agenda for the entire nation.

And conservatives—both Tea Party and cultural—should demand nothing less from a constitutional conservative Republican president. Every Republican candidate for the presidency should be required as a threshold issue for viability to state clearly what sort of judges he will appoint to the federal bench. Those who are not passionately committed to restoring fidelity to the Constitution in our nation’s courts should be utterly disqualified from being the standard-bearer of the GOP in 2016 and beyond.

The only legitimate way to interpret the Constitution—or any form or level of law, for that matter, including statutes and regulations—is originalism: the words of the Constitution and every law must be faithfully interpreted in accordance with what ordinary citizens would understand those words to mean. We are a democratic republic in which We the People rule through their elected representatives. The American people decided what words to put in the Constitution, and therefore unelected judges must be bound to apply the meaning the American people understood when those judges are exercising the awesome power of invoking the Constitution in a lawsuit.

This is a winning issue for conservatives. Most Americans believe that public policy should be decided by elected leaders answerable to the voters, not unelected judges. So most voters also believe that judges should strike down democratically-enacted laws only when the Constitution requires it, not whenever some judge thinks the people are wrong and that the his superior and enlightened understanding of life and liberty entitles him to supersede the will of the people. Making the courts a dominant issue in 2016—and the 2014 midterms—will help elect constitutional conservatives, especially to the White House and the United States Senate.

President Obama has declared an all-out war to remake the federal courts in his image. The Senate’s Democratic leadership completely supports Obama’s judicial agenda. Major battles are now imminent, and this will become a prominent issue in the 2014 midterm elections. And while many media outlets will seek to marginalize this matter or pretend this issue doesn’t exist at all, Breitbart News will cover this important struggle.

Ken Klukowski is senior legal analyst for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter@kenklukowski.

U.S. Military Reveals Coup D’etat Plan To Topple Obama

obama MISSINGIs a military coup about to occur here in America? According to this outstanding compilation video from David Vose, it very well may be. Though I am now and have ALWAYS been AGAINST any kind of violence, especially the kind of violence DISHED OUT BY OUR SHADOW GOVERNMENT AROUND THE ENTIRE WORLD via unjust wars and military occupations such as those in Iraq, Afghanistan and the list goes on, nothing burns me up more than the thought of living under a dictatorship of such PURE EVIL warmongers as Bush, Cheney, Obama and John Kerry who just want to bomb the entire world into submission. Thankfully, Americans are now STANDING UP and saying NO MORE to this FASCIST GOVERNMENT. Let’s all hope that this doesn’t turn violent, and of course, I do not advocate the OVERTHROW of any government, but if a coup happens here in America, TPTB can only blame themselves. In fact, the Declaration of Independence CLEARLY points out:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation….

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Continue reading

Ron Paul: Syria Chemical Attack Looks Like a “False Flag.” Pat Buchanan & Vladamir Putin Agree

Both Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan have said the chemical weapon attack in Syria looks like a false flag event designed as a pretext for America to attack. Russia president Vladamir Putin also said the chemical attack looks like the rebels carried it out themselves to use as a justification for the U.S. to get involved.