There corrupt “Nevada licensed criminals” are out of office in 2015…
Former Nevada AG (“NAG”) Catherine Cortez Masto
Former Washoe County DA Dick Gammick
Former Carson City DA Neil Rombardo
Call the FBI and the local news sources and demand an investigation, and charges filed against the corrupt licensed criminals like “Judge” Tatro, Sheriff Ken furlong and DA Neail Rombard and his corrupt sidekick Mark Krueger.
We’re also calling all Nevada Senators and Representatives to demand that FBI do their damn job and investigate that rampant corruption and criminal activity including “Acting under the color of Law” and RICO.
U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.
During 2012, 42 percent of the FBI’s total civil rights caseload involved color of law issues—there were 380 color of law cases opened during the year. Most of the cases involved crimes that fell into into five broad areas:
Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is “reasonably” necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully “unreasonable” or “excessive.”
Sexual assaults by officials acting under color of law can happen in jails, during traffic stops, or in other settings where officials might use their position of authority to coerce an individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the person if he or she doesn’t comply.
False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person’s civil rights may occur.
Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process; the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. During an arrest or detention, these rights can be violated by the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.
Filing a Complaint
To file a color of law complaint, contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided:
You may also contact the United States Attorney’s Office in your district or send a written complaint to:
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest
Washington, DC 20530
FBI investigations vary in length. Once our investigation is complete, we forward the findings to the U.S. Attorney’s Office within the local jurisdiction and to the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., which decide whether or not to proceed toward prosecution and handle any prosecutions that follow.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a pattern and practice investigation include:
Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, the Department of Justice has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental hospitals, retardation facilities, jails, prisons, nursing homes, and juvenile detention facilities when there are allegations of systemic derivations of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons.
Report Civil Rights Violations
The various Judges(Judge Harold “Hal” G. Albright, Judge Charles McGee and Federal Judge Miranda Du) involved in the various legal proceedings involving Ty Robben and the Carson City DA Neil Rombardo, Mark Krueger and Judge Tatro have a mandatory duty by law under the Nevada Judaical Code of Conduct and canons to report John Tatro, Neil Rombardo and Mark Krueger to the appropriate authorities. In this case that would be the FBI, the State Bar and the Commission on Judicial Discipline.
Nevada Judaical Code of Conduct:
Rule 2.14. Disability and Impairment. A judge having a reasonable belief that the performance of a lawyer or another judge is impaired by drugs or alcohol, or by a mental, emotional, or physical condition, shall take appropriate action, which may include a confidential referral to a lawyer or judicial assistance program.
 “Appropriate action” means action intended and reasonably likely to help the judge or lawyer in question address the problem and prevent harm to the justice system. Depending upon the circumstances, appropriate action may include but is not limited to speaking directly to the impaired person, notifying an individual with supervisory responsibility over the impaired person, or making a referral to an assistance program.
 Taking or initiating corrective action by way of referral to an assistance program may satisfy a judge’s responsibility under this Rule. Assistance programs have many approaches for offering help to impaired judges and lawyers, such as intervention, counseling, or referral to appropriate health care professionals. Depending upon the gravity of the conduct that has come to the judge’s attention, however, the judge may be required to take other action, such as reporting the impaired judge or lawyer to the appropriate authority, agency, or body. See Rule 2.15.
Rule 2.15. Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct.
(A) A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a substantial question regarding the judge’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
(B) A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
(C) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.
(D) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.
 Taking action to address known misconduct is a judge’s obligation. Paragraphs (A) and (B) impose an obligation on the judge to report to the appropriate disciplinary authority the known misconduct of another judge or a lawyer that raises a substantial question regarding the honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness of that judge or lawyer. Ignoring or denying known misconduct among one’s judicial colleagues or members of the legal profession undermines a judge’s responsibility to participate in efforts to ensure public respect for the justice system. This Rule limits the reporting obligation to those offenses that an independent judiciary must vigorously endeavor to prevent.
 A judge who does not have actual knowledge that another judge or a lawyer may have committed misconduct but receives information indicating a substantial likelihood of such misconduct, is required to take appropriate action under paragraphs (C) and (D). Appropriate action may include, but is not limited to, communicating directly with the judge who may have violated this Code, communicating with a supervising judge, or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body. Similarly, actions to be taken in response to information indicating that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct may include but are not limited to communicating directly with the lawyer who may have committed the violation or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body.
Rule 2.16. Cooperation With Disciplinary Authorities.
(A) A judge shall cooperate and be candid and honest with judicial and lawyer disciplinary agencies.
(B) A judge shall not retaliate, directly or indirectly, against a person known or suspected to have assisted or cooperated with an investigation of a judge or a lawyer.
 Cooperation with investigations and proceedings of judicial and lawyer discipline agencies, as required in paragraph (A), instills confidence in judges’ commitment to the integrity of the judicial system and the protection of the public.
[Added; effective January 19, 2010.]
WASHOE COUNTY NEWS — The Washoe County District Attorney’s community outreach team will be at tonight’s Sparks Farmer’s Market events in Victorian Square to answer questions residents may have about a variety of topics and programs.
“It provides an excellent opportunity for us to interact with the community because we get the chance to greet people and talk about what we do,” said Washoe County District Attorney Dick Gammick. “Our Family Support Division answers many questions, as does our investigations and administration departments, including the Washoe County Child Abuse Response & Evaluations team (CARES) and the Sexual Assault Response Team (SART).”
Gammick also said programs will have representatives at the Sparks Farmer’s Market on Victorian Avenue. “We have literature on issues such as cyber-bullying, your child’s Internet safety net, bullying, teens and driving drunk, drugged or drowsy, avoiding sexual coercion and more.”
The Sparks Farmer’s Market hours are 3 p.m. – 8 p.m. For more information, visit Sparks Farmer’s Market.
Published on Aug 4, 2013- Nolan Klein died in prison; the victim of a frame-up by Dick Gammick, Ron Rachow, William Geddies and others.
One of Dick Gammick’s cronies named Chris Hicks is being groomed for Dirty Dick’s position in the Washoe County District Attorney’s office. We would hope Chris Hicks would be better, and we’re sure he would be, except Dick Gammick has endorsed him leaving us to believe Mr. Hicks will run the same dirty shop as dirty Dick and he’ll just cover-up Dick’s corruption… We’re waiting to see if a challenger comes on board to take on Chris Hicks, who is the son of Reno Federal Court Judge Larry Hicks. clearly, the Hick’s are powerful elite in Washoe Co. Is Josh Hicks related?
See More on Tonja’s story to vindicate her brother Nolan Klein here: https://nevadastatepersonnelwatch.wordpress.com/category/justice-for-nolan-klein/
Washoe/Reno Board of County Commissioners Get an “earful” about Dirty DA Dick Gammick, vote rigging and other boondoggles – Jun 11, 2013
Washoe/Reno Board of County Commissioners Get an “earful” about Dirty DA Dick Gammick when Tonja Brown and Guy Felton speak.
Mike Weston tells the Board of Commissioners that
Washoe District Attorney Dick Gammick belongs in a Federal prison!
Sam Dehne is THE Encyclopedia of Reno govt.. AND Guardian of Reno citizens.
Why is Sam Dehne the only person with the gumption to expose the obvious Nevada vote rigging?
Gammick made the announcement while taping an episode of Nevada NewsMakers with Sam Shad this morning in Carson City. The show will air at 12:30 p.m. on KRNV.
“I’m not going to run for election again,” Gammick said. “My term is over January 2015.”
During the taping, Gammick endorsed Deputy District Attorney Chris Hicks, an 11-year veteran of the office who has prosecuted some of the region’s most high profile cases in the last decade. Hicks announced he will run for the office in 2014 during a separate segment on the show. “I’m behind him 100 percent,” Gammick said. “I think he’s a hell of an individual.”
Sheriff Mike Haley said he and Gammick built a healthy and professional relationship even if they did not always see eye to eye.
“Most disagreements centered around attitude about bigger issues, not specifically about one case or another case,” Haley said on Tuesday. “It was more often about how justice can be interpreted and maybe it wasn’t always that the bad guy had to go to jail. Maybe sometimes it was about what was the best strategy to deal with a particular criminal issue in the area of prevention and treatment.”
Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said Gammick’s legacy will show he was passionate about supporting victims of crime.
“He did an excellent job protecting Nevadans by holding criminals accountable,” Masto said in a statement. “Though he can never be fully replaced, we look forward to continuing our strong working relationship with the Washoe County District Attorney’s Office.”
Gammick has spent more than 40 years working in either law enforcement or as a prosecutor in Northern Nevada. Before running for district attorney in 1994 as a dark horse challenger, Gammick had already spent 10 years in the district attorney’s office under former DA Mills Lane.
Gammick, a Republican known for his blunt public persona, went on to win five terms with little electoral opposition until the 2010 election.
“He certainly had some detractors and certainly was not shy about taking on cases or being in the media,” said Eric Herzik, the political science department chairman at the University of Nevada, Reno. “But that’s not unusual for Washoe County DAs when you think of Bill Raggio, when you think of Mills Lane.”
Herzik added, “I would say he certainly served a long and successful tenure.”
Fred Lokken, a political science professor at the Truckee Meadows Community College, said Gammick was no stranger to controversy during his tenure, including the way his office handled the prosecution of Darren Mack, the Reno man who was ultimately convicted of murdering his wife and shooting a Family Court judge.
Gammick also drew the ire of the Washoe County Employee Association in 2011 after Kelli Viloria, a 14-year veteran prosecutor with the district attorney’s office, said she was forced to resign.
She and the employee group alleged she was fired in retaliation for lobbying state lawmakers to prevent district attorney office workers from becoming at-will employees, meaning they could be fired without cause.
Gammick called the allegations “a bunch of crap,” according to the Reno Gazette-Journal.
Regardless, “his ability to be re-elected suggested he was popular with the public,” Lokken said, noting Gammick developed a media-friendly law-and-order personality over the course of his career.
For example, Gammick told Shad on Tuesday, “A guilty verdict is better than sex.”
“The ruffling of feathers has kind of created a bit of a cult following for him,” Lokken said. “The perception was something that kind of (became) the basis for his electoral support.”
Gammick remains involved in several charitable causes in the region, including the Boys & Girls Club of Truckee Meadows and the Reno Rodeo Association.
Caesar Ibarra, the chairman of the board of the local Boys & Girls Club, said Gammick has been a longtime supporter of the organization.
“From his perspective I assume he sees and deals with a lot of stuff and he knows it starts at childhood,” Ibarra said. “If a kid has a good foundation they’re more likely to be a good citizen.”
Ed Basl, the Democrat who unsuccessfully ran against Gammick in the 1994, congratulated his former colleague from the Washoe County District Attorney’s office in an interview on Tuesday.
Today, Basl runs a Reno law firm and said it will be sometime before Gammick’s legacy is fully realized.
“Anytime anybody has been in there for 15 to 20 years you know that they earned it, and you can’t take any of that away,” Basl said.
We are helping these people save their dog named “Dude” with protests against Reno Animal Control and the DA Gammick. The Dog could be put down, owner says there is no proof of danger.
This reminds us the “Save Daisy the Dog” 2010 protests in Reno.
Sign the petition here: http://www.causes.com/actions/1734044-dude-deserves-to-be-evaluated-and-a-chance-to-live
RENO, Nev. (Mynews4.com & KRNV)- A local pit-bull deemed “dangerous” by a Reno Justice Court Judge in 2011, is heading to trial on April 22, 2013. The judge could decide the dog should be euthanized based on recent allegations. However, some question whether or not the dog has ever bitten anyone. Now the case is drawing a lot of attention. Continue reading
The Las Vegas Sun ran a story about the Nevada Supreme Court and the need for an appeals court. Our position is the Nevada should clean up the lower courts first since Nevada ranks near the bottom of the list for corruptibility. See Mike Weston’s Letter to the Editor of the Reno and Carson City newspapers.
Clean up the lower courts and the corruption. Nevada received a D- grade on the Center for Public Integrity study in 2012 indicating rampant corruption. Nevada was one of the worst State in the Union. Time after time we hear the horror stories of judges running amuck and acting above the law by acting under the color of law to carry out vendettas and help the good ol boy network.
The road kill includes the likes of Las Vegas Judge Kathy Kathy Halverson, Reno Judge Jerry Carr Whitehead, Douglas Co Judge Jim EnEarl. New controversy is happening in Reno and Carson City with Judges Scott Pearson and John Tatro where the law is completely ignored and justice is obstructed in the cases of Reno resident Mike Weston and ANTI-Corruption activist Ty Robben from So. Tahoe, and formally Carson City, NV.
We’re getting attention, and we have the “Worlds Largest CRIME SCENE tape” and 4 foot tall by 150 long bright yellow banner and other massive signs like “John Tatro End the RAMPANT Corruption” and “Masto Backdates” and “Treason is a Capital crime”.
Both of us have been “demanding justice” using the legal system, however the system is broken. Judge Pearson is ignoring the DA Dick Gammick’s willingness to vacate and expunge a trumped up charge from over 8 years ago and now admits NHP edited the audio video dash cam footage!
Why Nevada needs a new appellate court
Sens. Tick Segerblom and Mark Hutchison
Friday, March 22, 2013 | 2:02 a.m.
Article 6 of the Nevada Constitution currently provides for one appellate court — the Supreme Court. Every single appeal from decisions rendered by Nevada’s 82 District Courts must be reviewed by the Supreme Court. This two-tier court structure has resulted in a staggering caseload for the Nevada Supreme Court, and the delay of justice — sometimes by years — for Nevada citizens. Continue reading
Dick Gammick agrees with Mike Weston, the NHP edited dash cam video and Mr. Weston’s case/conviction should be vacated and expunged as stipulated by Washoe DA Dick Gammick.
Is Judge Scott Pearson obstructing justice by being the judge, jury and prosecutor to abuse his desecration in denying Mr. Weston justice after 8 years of fighting this corruption? Who does JP Scott think he is? A puppet for Redneck justice DA Gammick?
See Judge Scott Pearson’s contributors:
Scott Pearson worked for corrupt DA Gammick!
This video shows NHP edited the dash cam video
Congressional Testimony: Mike Weston to Bill Windsor of Lawless America in Carson City, Nevada
A decision is expected soon by the Reno Justice Court Judge Scott Pearson. Mike has also requested the court to report DA Dick Gammick to the “appropriate authorities” for the fraud and Brady Disclosure ( See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) violations of evidence tampering to withholding exculpatory evidence
The Supreme Court held that withholding exculpatory evidence violates due process “where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment”; and the court determined that under Maryland state law the withheld evidence could not have exculpated the defendant but was material to the level of punishment he would be given. Hence the Maryland Court of Appeals’ ruling was affirmed.
“Deleting portions of a video and leaving a time stamp to reflect such was done is not misconduct, let alone fraud.” (Emphasis added).
“[t]he State would not oppose the sealing of defendant’s record. Thus, if the relief granted is limited to that requested by the defendant, namely vacating his conviction and retuning fines and fees paid by the defendant without findings of fact or conclusions of law, the State would not oppose such relief.”
Nevada Highway Patrol protests DA DICK GAMMICK
Washoe DA Dick Gammick is a wannabe cop who illegally pulls people over acting under the color of law impersonating a peace officer.
Dick Gammick’s former daughter-in-law discusses how Gammick treated her when she sought court ordered child support from her ex-husband, Gammick’s son. Rebecca says Dick Gammick threatened her
Nevada Highway Patrol protests DA DICK GAMMICK
Nevada Highway Patrol protests
Nevada Highway Patrol protests
Nevada Highway Patrol protests
DA DICK GAMMICK AND NEVADA GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL
DICK GAMMICK protest
Nevada Highway Patrol protests DA DICK GAMMICK AND AG MASTO
To read the history, see our earlier story : https://nevadastatepersonnelwatch.wordpress.com/2012/07/25/july-2012-updates-continued-mike-weston-story-nhp-now-admits-to-editing-dash-cam-audiovideo
Mike’s case is like the LA dash cam incident where Police were caught by Their Own Dash Cam Framing Citizens For Another Cop’s Crimes
NEVADA LICENSED CRIMINALS
Nevada is a major example of the culture of corruption which plagues America.
The old Washoe County Courthouse in Reno where the Constitution and due process are commonly violated.
Wake up, America!
Sweeping legislation is needed to get tough with corrupt judges, politicians,
lawyers, and cops. The death penalty would be just and appropriate.
Persons who abuse public powers must be held accountable.
Let us declare war on corruption and do whatever it takes.
Our worst enemy is run-amok government.
~ Guy Felton, Publisher
Have YOU been victimized by Nevada’s corrupt legal system?
Mike Weston has and he’s fighting back!
On June 19, 2005, Weston was run off Interstate 80 near the Keystone exit in Reno by two vehicles traveling at extremely high speed. When he returned to the road, he soon came upon a Nevada Highway Patrol cruiser on the shoulder of the highway. Its driver, Officer Edward Bowers, had stopped a large pickup truck and was in process of issuing a citation to the truck’s driver.
Weston stopped his car behind the trooper’s cruiser.
After waiting at least three minutes to observe the officer’s situation and to determine that the officer was not engaged in a threatening scenario, Weston approached Bowers to report that he had just been run off the road by two reckless drivers who posed a clear and present danger to other vehicles. Significant dialogue discussed during this exchange is not included in an audio-video tape as played during Weston’s trial; this proves that evidence was altered to undermine truth. The tape was shot by a camera onboard the NHP cruiser.
Moments later, Bowers recognized Weston as a person who had previously criticized him. Bowers’ focus shifted to Weston being a critic and he, Bowers, indicated no concern with Weston’s close avoidance of what might have been a fatal accident ~ nor with the clear and present danger to other vehicles posed by the two speeding vehicles Weston reported to him.
Without issuing a warning to Weston, as mandated by law, Bowers issued a citation to Weston for “obstructing and delaying a peace officer”. The audio-video tape mentioned above proves that Bowers did not issue a warning as required by law. Weston was fully cooperative with Bowers; the tape documents this.
On August 19, 2005, Weston found himself in a kangaroo court with “Judge” Fidel Salcedo presiding. During this scenario Weston was victimized by editing of the audio-video tape, complete with a doctored timestamp, and by Officer Bowers lying under oath (perjury).
Weston is now requesting a new hearing. See below >>>>>>
Publishers comment: Mr. Weston has been and continues to be harassed by police officers with clear intent to intimidate him so that he will terminate his contacting government officials to report crimes committed against himself. When public employees authorized to carry lethal weapons feel themselves free to abuse their delegated powers to silence critics by intimidation or worse, a totally unacceptable situation is created. Peace officers who act as thugs against their employers should be tried for treason and, if convicted, executed.
This publisher has suggested to Mr. Weston that he begin keeping a log of any incident involving any action by any member of any law enforcement entity ~ including the corrupt FBI ~ which he, Weston, deems inappropriate. The same for any possible surrogate of any member of any law enforcement entity. If known, names of involved public employees or surrogates will be listed on this website and also reported by letter to the President of the United States.
As of November 14, 2011, Weston has 31 entries in his log of inappropriate actions taken against him by law enforcement officers. He has installed two video cameras in his car (facing front and rear) to document future incidents of harassment. Future incidents will be put on YouTube ~ with comments including names of rogue law officers.)
If any other Nevada citizen would like to report improper conduct on the part of any law enforcement officer, please send a BRIEF message to this publisher by email. Be sure to include your home phone number and suggest a time to call.
There is no doubt, whatsoever, that a citizens’ review board is needed in Washoe County to deal with public employees who should not be.
~ Guy Felton
State of Nevada v. Michael Weston, Case RCV 2005-023211
File: Michael Weston, 5-15-08
GROUNDS JUSTIFYING REQUEST FOR NEW HEARING
Suppression of evidence
Perjury ~ false statements
Clerk “Robin” denied Weston’s right to appeal when she told him at the last moment that he needed an affidavit.
Time code was altered on the Nevada Highway Patrol audio-video tape.
Court/NHP did not permit Weston to review said audio-video tape before his day in court (August 19, 2005).
Judge Salcedo denied Weston’s right to enter a relevant complaint letter and relevant response letter from Senator Harry Reid regarding an earlier complaint against the NHP.
Only 3 minutes of the NHP audio-video tape were shown in court out of a total time of 22 minutes.
Weston was forced by Bowers to restage a verbal exchange in front of the NHP cruiser’s camera. The restage was substituted on the “official” tape in place of the original exchange!
Weston’s car was searched without his permission by NHP officers and he, Weston, was ordered to not observe this search.
Bowers’ audio-video tape and the court transcript were both altered after Weston contacted Nevada Public Safety about discrepancies in the audio-video tape played during Weston’s day in court. Withheld evidence was crucial to proving Weston’s innocence regarding any wrong-doing.
During Bowers’ testimony in court, he stated, under oath, that Weston came up to him and said, “Excuse me, excuse me, I want to talk to you about SUVs and pickups.” This statement is not depicted on the audio-video tape as Bowers claimed when Weston first approached him.
The Court refused to give a copy of the NHP’s audio-video tape to Weston for his review and evaluation until after the deadline for filing an appeal.
The Court outright lied to Weston regarding the procedure for obtaining a transcript of his day in court. This to frustrate Weston’s procuring said transcript.
“Kelly” at the District Attorney’s Office informed Weston that evidence had been destroyed and then changed her story to say she didn’t know who had custody of said evidence. Weston was later permitted to obtain a copy of the evidence (audio-video tape) after the appeal period expired.
The audio-video tape documents that Sergeant Kinard (Bowers’ immediate supervisor) asked Bowers, “Did you tell him to hold off (i.e., give Weston due warning)?” Bowers replied, “Yes, I did.” Kinard then asked Bowers, “Did Weston do anything else wrong?” Bowers answered, “No.” Bowers, in fact, never gave due warning to Weston.
During the Court proceeding, there was no discussion regarding Weston having been (or not having been) given due notice before he was cited as required by law. Weston was not given due notice at the time of the subject incident.
The Prosecutor asked Bowers if the audio-video tape shown in Court depicted the true events that transpired. Bowers answered, “Yes.” Bowers lied in that the tape had been edited ~ not only for time, but also to leave out crucial evidence in Weston’s favor.
Judge Salcedo ignored Weston’s reporting to him that Court Clerk “Robin” did not permit him to file appeal papers which Weston attempted to submit in a timely manner.
While pursuing his case, Weston was harassed and stopped on the road a total of 6 times by NHP officers for ridiculous and fraudulent reasons.
Third-party hearsay evidence against Weston was used by the Prosecutor during her closing argument.
The Department of Public Safety made 2 trips to the evidence room on the 9th and 15th of December 2005 to retrieve and return the Weston audio-video tape. This was before Weston was permitted to copy the tape. Who did what with the tape before permitting Weston’s close evaluation of it?
Weston was made to feel that pursuing justice in his case was discouraged by Court officials and that the NHP would maliciously retaliate against him should he persist in doing so.
If Weston is denied fair review of his maltreatment by the Court and the NHP, he will be forced to pursue related litigation in federal court and also sue for heavy punitive damages in the amount of one million dollars.
FBI (Read their “We don’t give a damn” reply below.)
Senator Harry Reid & other federal officials
THE FBI IS PART OF THE
BELOW IS A REPLY LETTER TO WESTON FROM
AGENTS STEVEN M. MARTINEZ & MICHAEL A. WEST.
June 2, 2008
Dear Mr. Weston:
RE: Complaint against Edward Bowers
The FBI has reviewed your complaint of May 20, 2008, wherein you allege you have been the victim of a civil rights violation. Based on the review of your complaint information, no investigation will be initiated.
Enclosed with this letter please find the following items you provided to our office on May 23, 2008:
One VHS tape containing the video of Trooper Bowers dashboard camera depicting the incident; one DVD containing the audio from Reno Justice Court depicting the bench trial for Weston’s citation; one copy of the bench trial transcript; one copy of the letter from Office of Professional Responsibility (DPS); one copy of the letter to George Togliatti; one copy of Weston’s appeal letter; one copy of the ACLU complaint form; one copy of NRS 197.190; one copy of letter to the Nevada Commission of Judicial Discipline; one copy of of a response letter from the Commission of Judicial Discipline; one copy of a response letter from Senator Harry Reid; one copy of a newspaper article; and one copy of a sheet of paper with Nevada State Crimes. ###
Publisher’s comment: Martinez and West are asked to explain why they refer above to evidence tampering, perjury, and judicial fraud as “a civil rights violation”. Such willful mischaracterization of the felony crimes committed against Weston amounts to fraud, misprision of fraud, and obstruction of justice.
Also, the above letter fails to acknowledge receipt by the Reno FBI office of three documents submitted as evidence by Weston in addition to the items noted. These three documents were not returned to Weston; one is a printout of the altered times shown on the audio-visual tape:
TIME STAMP IRREGULARITIES DISPLAYED ON ORIGINAL TAPE
Minute 11 Incident begins
Minute 09 Does not display
Minute 07 75 seconds
Minute 06 55 seconds
Minute 05 15 seconds
Minute 04 68 seconds
Minute 03 45 seconds
Minute 02 25 seconds
Minute 01 55 seconds
Minute 59 40 seconds
Minute 58 15 seconds
Minute 59 Displays again / 40 seconds / Different content
Minute 57 85 seconds
Minute 56 70 seconds
Minute 55 25 seconds
Minute 54 55 seconds
Minute 53 23 seconds
Minute 52 95 seconds
Minute 51 Does not display
Minute 50 80 seconds
Minute 49 40 seconds
Minute 48 40 seconds
Minute 47 55 seconds
Minute 46 40 seconds
Minute 45 Does not display
Minute 44 25 seconds
Minute 43 55 seconds
Minute 42 25 seconds
Minute 41 Incident ends
Weston’s criminal and conspiratorial treatment by Nevada and federal employees will be brought to the attention of the Nevada Supreme Court, all members of the state legislature, and all members of Nevada’s congressional delegation.
Google “Abuses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation”
Think our national police force can be trusted? Truth is, it has a record of running amok.
We need a national referendum to abolish the FBI. Police powers should only be
entrusted to persons having sterling integrity and a sense of mission.
On November 23, 2012 Protesters gather in front of Reno Nevada home of Federal Prosecutor Assistant U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Rachow
Reno police (“RPD”) were apparently called by Mr. Rachow and RPD let the protesters continue their free speech and exercise their 1st amendment rights in front of Mr. Rachow’s Reno home. Thank you RPD, Guy Felton also thanks Steven Pitts and salutes the RPD, and we appreciate the professionalism of the RPD.
Please See http://www.justicefornolanklein.net
Please See Nevada Prison Watch
Please See The Nolan Klein story on Lawless America
Ron Rachow must be charged with the murder of Nolan Klein. – Tonja Brown