Will the thousands of classifed emails send Hillary to prison? If so, you can bet your bottom dollar that Bernie Sanders will not win the Democratic nomination. The word on the street is that a successor for Hillary has already been hand picked and she, yes she, would surface until the Democratic Convention. Hint: She is a woman, a liberal Democrat and just as dangerous. MORE IMPORTANTLY, SHE IS JUST AS CRIMINAL
Prison or President?
It is becoming increasingly clear that Hillary Clinton MAY not be a viable candidate for President in 2016, for much longer. The skeletons are falling out of her closet. In keeping with the recent Democratic party principle of choosing candidates from groups who have previously been disenfranchised, it is safe to say that the next Democratic Presidential candidate will not be a white male. Obama was the perfect candidate who could usher in anti-American legislation and he would be largely be criticism proof because he is black and if you oppose his politics, well, you must be a bigot. Along these lines of creating a candidate who would be largely immune to criticism, Hillary Clinton would be the ideal candidate because if you oppose her political agenda, well, you must be a sexist.
Unfortunately, for the Democrats and their puppet masters, Hillary is falling into disfavor with the American electorate. Subsequently, a new candidate must emerge and increasingly it appears that Dianne Feinstein is going to be that person. And she too, has the background to make her difficult to criticize because she is both a woman and she is Jewish. Therefore, if you oppose Feinstein’s political agenda, well, you must be a sexist and anti-Semitic. Should the demographics matter? Of course not, but this is the way the game has been played when it comes to legitimate criticism of Obama’s actions as President.
Meet Our New Hero
Senator Dianne Feinstein must have fallen down and hit her head. Feinstein has had an amazing transformation. Since June of 2014, Feinstein has transformed into a Constitutional superwoman who can leap unconstitutional acts in a single bound. In the past few months, this “Ron Paul” of the Democratic party has defended gun rights, free speech and has disavowed the use of torture by the CIA in her very public tweeting rebuke of the CIA
Dianne Feinstein is Hillary’s Relief Pitcher
Feinstein Protecting the World From CIA Torture
CIA director John Brennan once gave a press conference defending the agency from the Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA’s use of torture during the Bush administration. During the speech, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the primary author of the report, fact-checked Brennan’s assertions. The report is devastating to the career longevity of John Brennan and to the CIA as a whole. See the following tweets:
Brennan: “unknowable” if we could have gotten the intel other ways.
Study shows it IS knowable:
CIA had info before torture. #ReadTheReport
No evidence that terror attacks were stopped,
terrorists captured or lives saved through use of EITs. #ReadTheReport
For a senator who has defended every single violation of the Constitution by the government, in recent memory, these tweets were stunning.
CBS News recently portrayed Dianne Feinstein as a champion of American civil liberties when they stated “Dianne Feinstein
vs. the CIA …. principle who knows the importance of defending the Constitution
and individual liberty, …” Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton,
while speaking in San Diego was heckled with a bull horn. A few days earlier, Clinton had to duck a flying shoe. Americans are increasingly seeing Clinton as the “Butcher of Benghazi”, who denied Ambassador Stevens request for additional bodyguard protection at least three separate times prior to being murdered. And now there is the email scandal. Conversely, Feinstein is increasingly being portrayed as a champion of American liberties.
I almost fell out my chair when Senator Feinstein, stated in a 60 Minutes
interview earlier last 00year that the Second Amendment needed to be protected. Yet, this is the same Feinstein who famously stated on 60 Minutes
in 1995, “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ’em all in, I would have done it, This is the same Feinstein who defended unwarranted NSA spying
on every American just as long as they did not spy on her. Wait a minute, this is the same Dianne Feinstein that tried to ban free speech
on the Internet by independent journalists. I am confused, will the real Dianne Feinstein please stand up?
The Media’s Remaking of Feinstein’s Image
As we approach the clown and puppet show of 2016 (i.e. the general election), the powers that be are seeking to promote two candidates that they can dress up and parade in front of the American public in order to give the public the illusion that they have a real choice. On the Republican side we have Bush and Rubio. On the Democratic side, there is the presumptive candidate, Hillary Clinton. With Clinton’s past catching up to her, the Democrats need another “champion of liberty” waiting in the wings and increasingly, that person appears to be Senator Dianne Feinstein. Is Feinstein a legitimate candidate, or is she an insurance policy for Clinton should the tide of opposition continue to grow? Time will tell. Meanwhile, let’s put this newest “champion of the people” under the microscope.
The Dianne Feinstein Resume for President
CBRE, FDIC and Blatant Conflicts of Interest
In 2009, Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation which directed $25 billion in “taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband’s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry standards. Without being a member of the Senate Banking Committee, Feinstein curiously stepped outside of her bounds and offered to help the FDIC obtain money in its efforts to meet the increasing demand of compensation related to the ever-increasing level of home foreclosures. Feinstein’s offer was delivered only a few days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) , the commercial real estate firm that Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum leads as the undisputed board chairman, had just won the competitive bidding contest for a highly coveted federal contract to sell foreclosed properties that the FDIC would have inherited from a growing list of failed banks.
Feinstein and her husband denied any link between the legislation and the contract signed on November 13, 2009. Incredulously, the couple had the audacity to claim that they didn’t even know about CBRE’s business relationship with FDIC until after it was awarded, despite the fact the Blum was the Board Chairman.
The Washington Times notes that only a few days after consummating the contract with the FDIC, “CBRE raised $207 million through a stock offering that sold for $3.77 a share. Mr. Blum’s investment partnerships bought 10.6 million shares at the market price of $3.77. The stock offering was announced a couple of days before the signing of the FDIC contract.” This is called insider trading and Diane Feinstein and her husband, Richard Blum, are guilty of the offense. Martha Stewart’s jaw must have hit the floor because, amazingly, nobody went to jail. Could some liberal democrat please explain to America how Feinstein’s crimes are not as egregious as what Nixon did in the Watergate scandal?
The Perini and URS Scandals
Feinstein was a member of the Military Construction Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Subcommittee (MILCON) from 2001 to 2005. During her tenure, Feinstein voted for appropriations worth billions of dollars to her husband’s firms URS Corp. and Perini Corp.
Both Perini’s and URS’ majority shareholder is Richard Blum. It is estimated that Perini now holds at least $2.5 billion worth of contracts tied to the imperialist expansion of the United States military’s policy of endless war. Blum’s largest Department of Defense contracts are “indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity” or “bundled” contracts. Incredibly, you and I are on the hook for guaranteeing profit margins for the company. In May 2006, Perini held a series of bundled contracts awarded by the Army Corps of Engineers for work in the Middle East worth $1.73 billion. Perini has also been awarded an open-ended contract by the Air Force for military construction and environment quality control at closed military bases.
Feinstein’s personal wealth accumulation since becoming a senator has grown to nearly $200 million. Feinstein has never held a job outside of public service. I am having trouble understanding how a public servant accumulate a fortune of this magnitude.
There is so much more to the criminality of Senator Feinstein and her husband, that I would encourage readers to do more research in order to discover how rampant the criminality in Washington DC has actually become. Unfortunately, Feinstein’s betrayal of her oath of office does not end with her personal greed and subsequent abuse of power. It can be accurately stated that Feinstein is a traitor to the Republic.
Feinstein the 21st Century Benedict Arnold
Even the extreme left wing liberal newscaster, Rachel Maddow, has taken Feinstein to task over her alleged priorities and abuse of office.
The Ultimate Betrayal of the American People
Feinstein’s previous legislation includes a ban on semi-automatic handguns and shotguns in addition to rifles. The legislation also would have required mandatory registration of previously purchased guns. In other words, it is illegally retroactive and violates ex post facto prohibitions contained in the Constitution.